Visualising Digital Product Development with the C4 Model

Designing and scaling digital products whether web or mobile often involves orchestrating a complex mix of technologies, platforms and services. Communicating these architectures across development, design and business teams can be challenging especially when dealing with both technical and non-technical stakeholders. The C4 Model—Context, Container, Component and Code—offers a structured, multi-layered approach to visualising software systems making it easier to describe your product architecture at different levels of abstraction.  

According to the 2024 Stack Overflow Developer Survey nearly 80% of developers report facing difficulties explaining system architectures particularly when working with cross-functional teams. The C4 Model simplifies this by providing a clear, visual framework for describing key elements like APIs, databases, front-end and back-end services—making it invaluable for web and app development teams.  

In this article we’ll dive into how the C4 Model can be applied in digital product development offering practical insights for product managers and tech leads. 

What is the C4 model? 

The C4 Model, introduced by Simon Brown, is a framework designed to simplify the visualisation of software architecture. It breaks down complex systems into four key layers—Context, Container, Component and Code—allowing teams to create clear structured diagrams at varying levels of abstraction. Whether you're working on web or mobile applications, the C4 Model enables you to map out how different services, databases, APIs and front-end components interact. 

Why product and tech managers need the C4 Model 

One of the biggest challenges in digital product design is bridging the gap between business objectives and technical implementation. A Gartner survey shows that 62% of tech managers find it difficult to communicate system architecture to non-technical stakeholders, leading to misalignment and project delays. The C4 Model creates a shared vocabulary for product managers, developers and stakeholders, ensuring clarity. It enhances decision-making for product and tech managers by offering high-level overviews and detailed insights, aligning everyone on the architecture from structure to technical details. 

The four levels of the C4 model 

Context (C1): The big picture

The Context diagram provides a crucial high-level overview of a system, highlighting interactions between software and its environment. This perspective is essential for digital product teams to define system boundaries and external dependencies such as user interactions, third-party integrations and regulatory requirements. For example, in a multi-tenant SaaS platform, the diagram can depict user groups, external identity providers (like OAuth and LDAP), payment gateways (such as Stripe and PayPal), and regulatory systems (including GDPR-compliant services). This clarity aids in addressing strategic concerns around security and compliance, ensuring that non-technical stakeholders—like product managers, compliance officers and legal teams—grasp the system's broader operations. By identifying security needs and compliance requirements (e.g., PCI-DSS, GDPR), assessing risks linked to external dependencies and aligning both business and technical teams, the Context diagram enhances communication and facilitates effective decision-making. 

Container (C2): System structure and deployment

At the Container level, the focus is on essential system components like web applications, APIs, databases and services. This layer is crucial for cloud-native applications, helping product leaders understand how architecture is deployed across diverse environments—whether through microservices in Kubernetes, serverless functions in AWS Lambda or databases in managed services like Amazon RDS. It clarifies architectural patterns including microservices and monolithic systems and is vital for teams adopting Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) and DevOps practices, where deployment frequency and fault tolerance depend on effective container interaction and scaling. Managers can utilise this framework to plan deployment strategies, ensuring service availability with load balancing and redundancy. Additionally, understanding inter-container communication is key for managing API contracts, service orchestration with tools like Istio or Linkerd and observability through distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry. Lastly, containers empower product managers to assess scalability, aiding teams in planning how services will scale based on load demands. 

Component (C3): Detailing the building blocks

The Component diagram decomposes each container into smaller, specific functional units, often in line with Domain-Driven Design (DDD) principles. This method effectively maps services based on business domains like User Authentication, Order Processing, or Data Analytics. By clarifying service boundaries, the diagram helps IT and product managers discern tight and loose couplings, guiding decisions on synchronous APIs versus asynchronous messaging  
systems, such as Kafka or RabbitMQ. It fosters collaboration between technical stakeholders, like architects and engineers, and business stakeholders to define clear ownership and responsibilities. This collaborative effort allows product teams to work in parallel, reducing dependencies, enhancing testability, and facilitating smoother agile sprints. Furthermore, by promoting modularization and decoupling, each component can maintain a well-defined purpose, minimizing technical debt and adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). Such clarity also supports continuous integration practices, enabling teams to focus on unit and integration testing for individual modules without jeopardizing the entire system's integrity. 

Code (C4): A closer look at implementation 

The Code level of the C4 Model dives into the intricate details of classes, methods, and their interactions. Although this level doesn’t usually produce diagrams—often overlapping with traditional object-oriented design—it is vital for ensuring architectural consistency across development teams. Key architectural patterns like Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS), event sourcing, or hexagonal architecture should be evident in the code structure, emphasizing maintainability and scalability. To prioritize code quality and reduce technical debt, adhering to clean code principles and design patterns such as Factory, Repository, and Strategy is crucial, especially for large-scale projects. Leveraging automated static analysis tools like SonarQube can help monitor compliance with these principles. Additionally, structuring code for scalability and modularity allows teams to better manage long-term technical debt, with diagrams aiding in identifying areas for refactoring. This level also streamlines developer onboarding and enhances code reviews, as mapping implementation details to the architectural blueprint helps teams quickly identify divergences or violations of guidelines. 

Creating C4 diagrams  

The C4 model (Context, Containers, Components and Code) provides a visual framework for software architecture that aids in understanding and communicating complex systems. The creation of C4 diagrams is essential for effectively representing the different layers of a system. Here’s how to create each type of C4 diagram:  

Tools for creating C4 diagrams  

Several tools can facilitate the creation of C4 diagrams. Here are a few popular options:  

• Structurizr: A cloud-based tool specifically designed for creating C4 diagrams. It offers a simple DSL (domain-specific language) for defining your model and generating diagrams automatically.  

• Draw.io: A versatile diagramming tool that supports a wide range of diagram types including C4. It allows for easy drag-and-drop functionality and sharing capabilities.  

• Lucidchart: Another user-friendly diagramming tool that supports collaboration. It offers templates and the ability to create interactive diagrams.  

• PlantUML: A text-based tool for creating diagrams from a simple markup language. PlantUML can generate C4 diagrams when paired with specific libraries or configurations.  

Best practices for designing C4 diagrams  

To ensure clarity and effectiveness in your C4 diagrams, consider the following best practices:  

• Keep it simple: Avoid overcomplicating diagrams. Focus on the most important elements to maintain clarity.  

• Use consistent terminology: Use standard names and descriptions for components and systems to avoid confusion among team members.  

• Define boundaries: Clearly delineate the boundaries of systems and components to highlight their interactions.  

• Use colours and shapes wisely: Employ different colours and shapes to represent different types of components or interactions, enhancing visual communication.  

• Iterate and update: C4 diagrams should evolve alongside the system. Regularly update them to reflect changes in architecture and design.  

Implementing the C4 model in projects  

Integrating the C4 model into software development projects can enhance both communication and clarity among team members and stakeholders.  

Integrating C4 into the development lifecycle  

• Agile methodologies: In Agile environments, C4 diagrams can be used during sprint planning and retrospective meetings. By creating context and container diagrams at the beginning of a project, teams can establish a shared understanding of the system. Component diagrams can then be developed as features are iterated on during sprints.  

• DevOps practices: The C4 model complements DevOps practices by providing a clear architecture that informs CI/CD pipelines. By visualising containers and components, teams can identify dependencies and potential bottlenecks in the deployment process.  

• Waterfall methodologies: For teams using Waterfall methodologies, the C4 model can be used to develop comprehensive architecture documentation during the planning phase. Each diagram can serve as a reference throughout the project lifecycle.  

Collaboration and communication  

The C4 model enhances collaboration and communication within teams by providing a shared visual language. Here are a few ways it can be effectively used:  

• Engaging non-technical stakeholders: C4 diagrams are designed to be understandable by both technical and non-technical audiences. By presenting high-level context diagrams during stakeholder meetings, architects can facilitate discussions that involve business stakeholders without overwhelming them with technical details.  

• Team alignment: Regularly reviewing C4 diagrams in team meetings fosters alignment and helps ensure that everyone is on the same page. It serves as a reference point for discussions around design choices, trade-offs and system changes.  

• Documentation: C4 diagrams can also serve as part of the project’s documentation. They provide a visual summary of the architecture, making it easier for new team members to onboard and understand the system quickly.  

The C4 model serves as a powerful tool for visualising software architecture, fostering collaboration and enhancing communication among stakeholders. By effectively creating C4 diagrams and implementing the model throughout the development lifecycle, teams can overcome common challenges and leverage its strengths. However, it’s essential to acknowledge the limitations of the model and to supplement it with additional tools and practices as needed. Ultimately, embracing the C4 model can lead to more coherent, well-structured and communicative architectural practices in software development. 

Should you wish to explore how our expertise can assist your team in developing world-class digital products, please do not hesitate to get in touch.  

For further insights and top tips on digital product strategy, subscribe to our newsletter below.